by Aaron Lakoff
January 20, 2006, Port au Prince

:::===:::===:::===:::===:::===:::===:::===:::===:::===:::===:::===:::===
-->To view photos of the consequences of Canadian and UN policy in Haiti,
visit:
http://gallery.cmaq.net/album52
:::===:::===:::===:::===:::===:::===:::===:::===:::===:::===:::===:::===

In his book “The Uses of Haiti”, author Paul Farmer writes;

“...the world's privileged are protected from suffering violence, they are
protected from having to perpetrate it – directly – and they are protected
from having to apologize for it. This, then, is the political economy of
brutality. Just as the violence of the poor must be understood as imbeded
in their poverty – the structural violence done to them – so, too, must
the 'goodness' of the rich be measured against their power and
privilege.”1

Here, I hope to illustrate how my country, Canada, is profiting from this
political economy of brutality that Farmer describes here in Haiti.

Admittedly, I came to Haiti having known very little about the country
just six months prior. My voyage here was very much an attempt to relay
information, to the best of my abilities, to Canadians, in order to
further expose Canada's role in Haiti. Just as Canada is now carrying out
its brutal policy of Responsibility to Protect, a modern version of 'white
man's burden', I feel that citizens of the Canadian state like myself have
a responsibility to confront the real issue in Haiti – that of Canadian
imperialism.

To follow Farmer's analytical framework of a political economy of
brutality, let us first examine who is suffering from this violence.
Yesterday, we visited the Ste-Catherine's hospital in Cite Soleil, the
largest and poorest area of Port au Prince. While ailing patients lay
hooked up to I.V. Tubes in rows of beds, it was impossible to not notice
that the exterior and interior walls of the hospital were covered with
bullet holes. In a shocking image that will never leave my mind, there
was a large bullet hole in a glass window looking in on cribs in the
children's ward. Eyewitnesses told us that at around 11pm the previous
night, the hospital came under heavy fire, and the perpetrators were
MINUSTAH (United Nations Stabilization Mission in Haiti) troops. Opening
fire on a hospital is a serious war crime under the Geneva Convention, and
here, in Cite Soleil, we were looking at the evidence of war crimes
committed by the very body which is supposed to uphold international law.

On the ground floor of the hospital, we met Valencia, an 8-year old girl
who was recovering from a gunfire wound she sustained the night before,
when MINUSTAH let loose a few rounds on her house. Her father, standing
beside her bed, still looked like he was in shock.

Dead bodies were strewn throughout the streets on Thursday morning. The
death toll of the day, even before noon, was three. Residents said all
three were killed by MINUSTAH, and all three were unarmed. We saw the
dead body of one unidentified man, still baking in the hot sun, who was
gunned down just blocks away from a large cart that he used to deliver
groceries and other goods for a living.

This week's death toll in Cite Soleil was already over ten, all killed by
UN forces. For many like myself, we have been raised by the myth that the
UN, the infamous and benevolent 'casques bleus', operate around the world
to protect peace and security. Now the UN is even publicly admitting that
they have killed civilians as 'collateral damage' in some of their
missions.

Two important questions must be asked; who constitutes this collateral
damage, and why is the UN killing and not saving lives?

The answer to the first question is simple and well-documented. Just like
hundreds of thousands of Madeline Albright's little targets in Iraq, the
collateral damage in Haiti is found amongst the nation's poorest. They
are the ones suffering the brunt of this violence.

The answer to the second question is slightly more complicated, and leads
into the second part of Farmer's thesis. It also begins to uncover
Canada's not-so-well hidden interests in the country. In a nutshell, the
UN is committing acts of violence in Haiti because the country's
privileged are protected from having to perpetrate that violence directly.
They are putting pressure on the UN to do their dirty work for them.

Haiti's privileged and wealthy, represented by the Group of 184, a
so-called 'civil society' group that orchestrated the bloody coup d'etat
against democratically-elected president Jean-Bertrand Aristide in 2004,
have a lot at stake right now. In order to protect their carefully
planned coup, they need two things to happen; a) that their favored
candidate (and sweatshop owner), Charles Henri Baker, get elected as
president, and b) that the support base for Lavalas candidate Rene Preval,
traditionally found in poor areas like Cite Soleil and Bel Air, be
effectively demobilized and crushed.

The Group of 184 is taking steps to ensure these things happen before the
elections on February 7th. In order to put pressure on MINUSTAH to get
tough on crime and 'terrorism', they called for a general business strike
on January 9. On January 16th they held a sit-in in front of the UN
mission headquarters in the capital. Indeed they got their wish, and
MINUSTAH killed four more people the same day as the demonstration.

The Group of 184 is led by a shady cast of characters. Their
spokesperson, Andy Apaid Jr., is the owner of Alpha Industries, the
largest garment producer in Haiti. In his factories, more aptly called
sweatshops, workers toil to produce clothing for Montreal-based Gildan
Activewear. Most are women between the ages of 18-30 years old, and are
paid a measly 75 Gourdes (Less than $2 US) per day.

Another important Group of 184 player is Reginald Boulos, head of the
Haitian Chamber of Commerce. According to the Haiti Information Project,
Boulos was also implicated in the death of 60 children after his company,
Pharval Pharmaceuticals, produced a poisonous cough syrup distributed
throughout poor neighborhoods of the capital. . Patrick Elie, a Haitian
activist we met the other day, recounts to us how he applied for a job
with a pharmaceutical company in Canada. When he told his prospective
employers that he used to work for the Boulos family in Haiti, they
replied, “You know, those guys are killers...”

So how does a group of rich maquiladora-owners and mad scientists maintain
even a shred of credibility on the international scene? Through plenty of
funding and support from the USA, France, and Canada.

Since the 2004 coup d'etat, Canada has lent its explicit support to the
Group of 184, not only in sending 500 soldiers to aid in the process of
ousting Aristide, but also by funding many of the opposition groups in the
Group of 184 via CIDA (Canadian International Development Agency).
Seemingly progressive Canadian NGO's such as Alternatives and Rights and
Democracy have helped maintain the Group of 184's credibility by affirming
that they are indeed a 'civil society' group.

Through this support for the Group of 184, Canada has also supported de
facto all the institutions that are committing human rights abuses in
post-coup Haiti, including the interim Haitian government. Thousands of
political prisoners continue to sit behind bars without charges since the
coup, while Paul Martin has denied their very existence as such. At the
same time, known killer and coup leader, Guy Phillipe, who was trained by
the CIA in Ecuador, is running for president. The Canadian Embassy in
Haiti, who was quick to support the removal of Aristide, has had little to
say about this.

Furthermore, through its support for the Group of 184, Canada is also
turning a blind eye to the killings of MINUSTAH. Haiti's poor know quite
well who is responsible for these attacks. As Jean-Joseph Joel, a
resident of Cite Soleil put it, “MINUSTAH must cease being manipulated by
the private business sector – stop taking orders from the hands of Baker,
Boulos, and Apaid, at the detriment of the masses, to destroy the people
of Cite Soleil, Bel Air, Laforcette, to destroy all who live in the
popular neighborhoods”.

Canada's Responsibility to Protect, a racist doctrine itself, on the
ground looks like poor Haitians being slaughtered.

So to bring us to the third and final part of Farmer's political economy
of brutality, we have to turn close to home. This is where we find the
perpetrators who are protected from having to apologize. I am Canadian
(as an anarchist, that's a hard admission), and my concern is primarily
what my government is doing in Haiti, in my name.

Canadians are going to the polls for a federal election on January 23rd.
The lead-up to our own elections won't be a bloodbath, but for Haiti, the
outcome could be. Sadly, the outcome of our election won't make for any
positive change in Haiti. Either the Liberals will form the new
government (and we've already seen their abysmal performance here), or the
Conservatives will, bringing our foreign policy even more in line with the
global hegemony politics of the USA.

But a look to the north end of Montreal shows an interesting scene playing
out. There, where many Haitian-Canadians reside, Canada's Liberal Foreign
Affairs Minister, Pierre Pettigrew, is engaged in the fight of his
political career – and he's loosing.

Pettigrew is one of the main players responsible for Canada's imperialist
ventures in Haiti, but when called on it, he is unrepentant. In fact he
is proud of Canada's role in Haiti.

Haitians in Montreal, along with activist groups such as Haiti Action
Montreal, are ready to fire Pettigrew from his job. He's been publicly
challenged and humiliated, and now posters with his face denouncing him
for crimes against humanity cover telephone polls in his riding. As the
most recent polls show he is way down, he actually might soon be forced to
say his apologies.

Our solidarity with the Haitian people demands that we make people like
Pettigrew, Martin, and the rest of the Canadian government pay for their
crimes. We must challenge the structural violence being done unto Haiti's
poor, and we must take down the defenses that allow for the profiting by
the Canadian state of this political economy of brutality. Voting out
Pettigrew and the likes could be a start, but imperialism doesn't end at
the ballot boxes. We need not a new foreign policy towards Haiti, and it
isn't enough for people like the NDP's Svend Robinson to go down to Haiti
if he is elected, as he has promised. Canada needs to get out of Haiti,
and the mechanisms of the political economy of brutality that we have seen
need to be abolished. After all, Haitians are demanding no less.

[Aaron Lakoff is an activist and independent journalist based in Montreal.
He will be in Haiti for the month of January, filing reports focused on
the role of Canada in the country. He can be reached at
montrealtohaiti@resist.ca]